A few things have been bugging me about the way characters are behaving in movies lately, and I would like to address those now. It's human nature to think about what we would do in certain extreme circumstances, and although you can't really know for certain what you'd do until you get there, I am quite positive that the following things would be true:
- If I am face-to-face with a cold-blooded serial killer who has murdered innocent people and will almost certainly do it again, and I have a gun, I will SHOOT that person. I will not hesitate. I will not hold the gun at them, my hands shaking, and then put the gun away because killing them would make me the same as them... because it wouldn't. They killed innocent people and will continue killing. I would kill a murderer to stop him and never kill again. It's not the same at all, and pretending that it is is one of those empty philosophical statements that SOUND very deep and meaningful but are actually stupid.
- If I am in a situation in which one of my loved ones is in danger and I can either leave them to die or go try to save them and then we would BOTH die, I would (tearfully) leave them behind. Note that I am not talking about situations in which I actually had a chance of saving them. In that case, I would absolutely try. I'm talking about those movie situations where the nuke is about to explode and someone sprains their ankle and there's absolutely no possible way to help them out of there before the bomb explodes but the "hero" goes back for them anyway even though there's no hope and then they both die like they knew they would, so going back for them accomplished nothing.
- ...ESPECIALLY if the fate of the world rests on my staying alive to complete the mission. "I know that if I go back for Joe, I won't be able to get to the control tower in time to stop the countdown and everyone on Earth will die, but I can't just LEAVE Joe!" Of course you can, you dimwit. There are billions of innocent people who will die if you don't. Is Joe more important than those billions of people--especially, I hasten to point out, since if you go back for Joe, then Joe (as part of those billions of people) will die anyway, just a few minutes later than he would have before?
I did see a movie, recently, which was a twist on scenario #3... the fate of the world was at stake, and the spaceship crew didn't have enough oxygen left to get all four of the crew members to the destination to prevent the extinction of the human race, so they had to decide whether or not to murder one of their crewmates for the sake of humanity. Of course, one death is nothing compared to billions of deaths, so the principle stays the same, but it makes it a much more complex decision when it's actually killing someone rather than just not saving them. The movie was
Sunshine, starring Cillian Murphy, if you're interested. The ending is a little... farfetched. But it's a good movie nonetheless. More character-driven than your typical sci-fi movie, so I think even people who dislike sci-fi would potentially enjoy it.
If you see it (or have already seen it), let me know what you thought.